Showing posts with label Public Sector Banks in India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Public Sector Banks in India. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 March 2020

SBI lowers lending rate by up to 15 bps; 10th cut in current fiscal

Overnight and one-month MCLRs have been reduced by 15 basis points to 7.45 per cent each. Three-month MCLR has been revised to 7.50 per cent from 7.65 per cent
SBI
The country’s largest lender State Bank of India (SBI) on Wednesday said it has reduced its marginal cost of fund-based lending rate (MCLR) by up to 15 basis points across various tenors, effective March 10. The bank has reduced its one-year MCLR by 10 basis points to 7.75 per cent from 7.85 per cent earlier, the SBI said.
This is 10th consecutive cut in MCLR by the bank in the current fiscal. Overnight and one-month MCLRs have been reduced by 15 basis points to 7.45 per cent each. Three-month MCLR has been revised to 7.50 per cent from 7.65 per cent. The new two-year and three-year MCLRs stand reduced by 10 basis points to 7.95 per cent and 8.05 per cent, respectively.
On Monday, another state-run lender Union Bank of India had announced cut in its MCLR by 10 basis points across all tenors, effective March 11. This is the ninth consecutive rate cut announced by the Mumbai-based bank, since July 2019. The bank has cut its one-year MCLR to 8 per cent from 8.10 per cent. The overnight MCLR has been revised to 7.55 per cent, while the new one month rate stands at 7.60 per cent, the bank had said.

Thursday, 12 December 2019

RBI had no objection to issuance of electoral bonds through SBI, says FM

She said the Committee of the Central Board (CCB) of RBI in its meeting held on October 11, 2017 indirectly agreed for electoral bonds to be issued if it is done by the SBI.
Nirmala Sitharaman
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday said in Rajya Sabha that the RBI had no objection to issuance of electoral bonds through the State Bank of India (SBI). Replying to a supplementary during the Question Hour on electoral bonds through the SBI, the Finance Minister said the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) being a stakeholder was involved in extensive consultations with the government at the stage of conceptualisation. “During the consultation process they had questions about the particular platform for its issuance as to who is going to issue. And also the proforma with which it is going to be issued.
“These consultations were recorded but at the end of it as long as the bonds were going to be issued by the SBI, they did not have any objection,” Nirmala Sitharaman said. She said the Committee of the Central Board (CCB) of RBI in its meeting held on October 11, 2017 indirectly agreed for electoral bonds to be issued if it is done by the SBI. The Bank in the CCB meeting and other internal fora would have discussed the multiple facets of the Electoral Bonds schemes.
She said the proceedings of CCB mention that “the CCB supported the Bank’s stand on not issuing the EBs in scrip form and observed that if the Government decides to issue EB in scrip form through SBI, the Bank should let it be.” The main reasons for issuing EBs in bearer form are to bring in transparency to funding in the political system, she said…

Tuesday, 16 July 2019

RBI slaps Rs 7-crore penalty on SBI for violating various regulatory norms

This is one of the highest penalty amounts on any bank in the recent past
Liquidity management tool: RBI may have to balance old norms with the new
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has forced a punishment of Rs 7 crore on State Bank of India (SBI) for resistance with administrative standards, for example, salary acknowledgment and resource order (IRAC) and sharing data. This is one of the most elevated punishment sums on any bank in the ongoing past.
SBI, the nation’s greatest bank, likewise neglected to consent to headings on opening and working current records, announcing of information to the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC), and detailing of fakes. The Reserve Bank of India had completed the statutory investigation to survey SBI’s money related position on March 31, 2017. The review uncovered resistance with headings on IRAC standards, sharing of data about clients with different banks, revealing of information, misrepresentation chance administration, and arrangement and announcing of fakes.
Following the investigation, the RBI issued a show-cause take note. Subsequent to thinking about the bank’s answer and oral entries, the RBI reached the resolution that charges of rebelliousness were substantiated and justified burden of financial punishment. The RBI said the punishment has been forced in exercise of forces vested under different areas of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This activity depends on lacks in administrative consistence. It isn’t planned to articulate upon the legitimacy of any exchange or understanding went into by the save money with its clients, the RBI said.
Rs 10-lakh fine on Union Bank
The Reserve Bank of India(RBI) has forced a punishment of Rs 10 lakh on Union Bank of India for non-compliancewith the bearings on digital security system. The RBI inspected the digital security structure of the bank, following reports of seven deceitful messages (of $171 million) produced through the SWIFT arrangement of the bank in 2016.

14th BRICS summit to review current global issues, reach key agreements

  At the   14th BRICS summit   which is to be hosted by China in a virtual mode on 23-24 June, the member nations will review the current gl...